data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4c22/f4c22d8b580c1af9772959b61d94b94d3d0e39cc" alt=""
OK, so I'd heard of Blish and I figured this was in the same vein as Eric Frank Russell's Men, Martians & Machines. It was only when I got home and read the blurb that I realized the stories were adapted from TV episodes which were not, as it turned out, going to air in Britain until the summer of '69. My mental image of the characters was informed solely by that cover. So I read the stories envisaging Spock as green and Bones looking like an older Jimmy Olsen.
I gave the book to a friend of mine at school who was taken to hospital with rapid-onset diabetes. He and I used to swap Ace Doubles (back-to-back SF books) that you could buy super-cheap in Woolworths back then, so I figured he'd enjoy Star Trek. A few months later the BBC started running the show and all my friends became Trekkers. But I got there first.
With its grown-up storylines and in-built socialist humanism, Star Trek was always going to appeal more to me than the reactionary trend in SF typified by tropes like - well, royalism and mysticism and black-&-white morality and libertarianism. Naming no names. It was another era; an age of reason and hope. We were boldly going together towards a future that never contained the likes of Trump and Brexit.
Trivia extra: I'm reliably informed by Shaquille S Le Vesconte that "Star Trek was originally due to air in the UK in the autumn of 1968 but was put back until the summer of 1969."
ReplyDeleteThe hopeful optimism of humanity's best face forward exemplified by ST will persist but in the quiet, cloistered, cautious way that alchemy turned into chemistry, superstition into enlightenment. We can help it along with good stories. Ones where the good of the many outweigh the good of the few, and the first impulse of humans isn't greed but curiosity.
ReplyDeleteWell said!
Delete